Construction and evaluation of a short-term prognostic model for acute ischemic stroke in emergency settings

  • Na Chen Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai 054000, China
  • Junbo Wang Department of Interventional Vascular Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai 054000, China
  • Yuxin Liu Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai 054000, China
  • Lijing Zhao * Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai 054000, China
Article ID: 4575
Keywords: acute ischemic stroke; prediction model; frailty screening questionnaire

Abstract

Objective: To develop a prediction model for 14-day poor prognosis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients in emergency settings and evaluate its predictive accuracy. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study, enrolling AIS patients admitted to our hospital between October 2018 and December 2020, within 72 h of symptom onset. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with poor prognosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine cutoff values for continuous variables, which were subsequently discretized based on clinical relevance. A clinical scoring model for short-term prognosis was constructed using the β coefficients of selected variables. AIS patients admitted between January and December 2021 served as the internal validation cohort to assess the model’s performance. Results: A total of 321 patients were included, with 223 in the training cohort and 98 in the validation cohort. Multivariate logistic regression identified age, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), prealbumin (PA), infarct volume, Frailty Screening Questionnaire (FSQ), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores as independent predictors of poor short-term prognosis. The prognostic scoring system, with a total score of 15, included the following components: age ≥ 74 years (1 point), PA ≤ 373 mg/L (2 points), large-artery atherosclerosis (1 point), cardioembolic stroke (2 points), infarct volume ≥ 2.18 cm3 (2 points), FSQ score ≥ 3 (1 point), and NIHSS score ≥ 4 (6 points). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting poor prognosis was 0.927 (95%CI: 0.894~0.960), with an optimal cutoff score of ≥5 points, yielding a sensitivity of 0.770 and specificity of 0.976. The model’s performance in the validation cohort was consistent, with an AUC of 0.892 (95%CI: 0.827~0.957). Conclusion: The short-term prognostic scoring system for AIS demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy and offers valuable guidance for clinicians in early prognosis assessment in emergency settings.

Published
2025-08-19

References

1. Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, et al. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2018; 16(4): 203-212. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0119-4

2. Hanaa A, EL-Gendy MD, ANE MD, et al. Systemic Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Cerebral Stroke: A Systematic Review. The Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2021; 89(6): 685-694. doi: 10.21608/mjcu.2021.167879

3. Alamowitch S, Turc G, Palaiodimou L, et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke. European Stroke Journal. 2023; 8(1): 8-54. doi: 10.1177/23969873221150022

4. Gao J, Shao X, Guan Y, et al. Effect of Danhong injection on neurological recovery and adverse events in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Medicine. 2021; 100(46): e27683. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000027683

5. Sharobeam A, Jones B, Walton-Sonda D, et al. Factors delaying intravenous thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Neurology. 2020; 268(8): 2723-2734. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09803-6

6. Hogan DB, Maxwell CJ, Afilalo J, et al. A Scoping Review of Frailty and Acute Care in Middle-Aged and Older Individuals with Recommendations for Future Research. Canadian Geriatrics Journal. 2017; 20(1). doi: 10.5770/cgj.20.240

7. Pilleron S, Soto‐Perez‐de‐Celis E, Vignat J, et al. Estimated global cancer incidence in the oldest adults in 2018 and projections to 2050. International Journal of Cancer. 2020; 148(3): 601-608. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33232

8. Bandettini di Poggio M, Finocchi C, Brizzo F, et al. Management of acute ischemic stroke, thrombolysis rate, and predictors of clinical outcome. Neurological Sciences. 2018; 40(2): 319-326. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3644-3

9. Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Deswal A, et al. Contributory Risk and Management of Comorbidities of Hypertension, Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, and Metabolic Syndrome in Chronic Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134(23). doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000450

10. Yoshimura S, Lindley RI, Carcel C, et al. NIHSS cut point for predicting outcome in supra-vs infratentorial acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2018; 91(18): e1695-e1701.

11. Freyschlag CF, Boehme C, Bauer M, et al. The Volume of Ischemic Brain Predicts Poor Outcome in Patients with Surgically Treated Malignant Stroke. World Neurosurgery. 2019; 123: e515-e519. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.197

12. Tonetti DA, Desai SM, Hudson J, et al. Large Infarct Volume Post Thrombectomy: Characteristics, Outcomes, and Predictors. World Neurosurgery. 2020; 139: e748-e753. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.139

13. Ganesh A, Ospel JM, Menon BK, et al. Assessment of discrepancies between follow-up infarct volume and 90-day outcomes among patients with ischemic stroke who received endovascular therapy. JAMA network open. 2021; 4(11): e2132376-e2132376.

14. Nielsen BR, Andersen HE, Hovind P, et al. Sarcopenia and self-reported markers of physical frailty in patients with osteoporosis. Archives of Osteoporosis. 2024; 19(1). doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01437-9

15. Pinho J, Küppers C, Nikoubashman O, et al. Frailty is an outcome predictor in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular treatment. Age and Ageing. 2021; 50(5): 1785-1791. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab092

16. Taylor JA, Greenhaff PL, Bartlett DB, et al. Multisystem physiological perspective of human frailty and its modulation by physical activity. Physiological Reviews. 2023; 103(2): 1137-1191. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00037.2021

17. Kim M, Lee SJ, Park SY, et al. A novel etiological classification in patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion and endovascular treatment: discordance with the classic and SSS TOAST systems: A retrospective cohort study. Precision and Future Medicine. 2023; 7(2): 83-89. doi: 10.23838/pfm.2023.00065

18. Zhang T, Jiang Y, Zhang S, et al. The association between homocysteine and ischemic stroke subtypes in Chinese. Medicine. 2020; 99(12): e19467. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000019467