A machine learning predictive model based on conventional two-dimensional echocardiography and serum biomarkers for early detection of ascending aorta dilation in BAV patients

  • Xingyu Long * Department of Cardiac Function Examination of Heart Centre, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750004 Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • Yunxia Niu Department of Hematology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750004 Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • Guixuan Nie Department of Cardiac Function Examination of Heart Centre, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750004 Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • Sijing He Department of Cardiac Function Examination of Heart Centre, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750004 Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • Lisha Na Department of Cardiac Function Examination of Heart Centre, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 750004 Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
Article ID: 4573
Keywords: bicuspid aortic valve; ascending aorta; echocardiography; lipid profile; machine learning

Abstract

Objective: To compare echocardiographic parameters and lipid biomarker levels between patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) associated with ascending aorta dilation and those without dilation using machine learning models, and to identify early diagnostic features for BAV-associated dilation. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 51 BAV patients (25 with ascending aorta dilation and 26 without) from the Ningxia Medical University Affiliated Hospital (January 2024–November 2024) was enrolled. Routine echocardiography and lipid profile measurements were performed. Lasso regression was applied to select key features, construct a predictive model, and develop a nomogram for individualized risk assessment. Results: BAV dilation group exhibited significantly higher AAoV and AAoMPG than the non-dilation group (P < 0.05 for both). HDL levels were also elevated in the dilation group (P < 0.05). Lasso regression identified five critical features: age, HDL, ApoB, LVMI, and AAoV, with the model formula: Y = −0.02678133 + (0.10741491 × age) + (0.25612267 × HDL) + (−0.12903915 × ApoB) + (0.14253473 × LVMI) + (0.49063628 × AAoV). The model achieved an AUC of 0.825 (95% CI: 0.694–0.933). Conclusion: This study successfully identified key features using Lasso regression and developed an efficient predictive model for BAV-associated ascending aorta dilation. The model demonstrates strong diagnostic performance, interpretability, and clinical applicability. The nomogram provides a practical tool for individualized risk prediction, aiding early diagnosis, intervention decisions, and patient follow-up.

Published
2025-08-19

References

1. Sillesen AS, Vøgg O, Pihl C, et al. Prevalence of Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Associated Aortopathy in Newborns in Copenhagen, Denmark. JAMA. 2021; 325(6): 561. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.27205

2. van de Pol V, Kurakula K, DeRuiter MC, et al. Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Development in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: What Is the Role of Endothelial Cells? Frontiers in Physiology. 2017; 8. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00938

3. Siu SC, Silversides CK. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 55(25): 2789-2800. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068

4. Rabuş MB, Kayalar N, Sareyyüpoğlu B, et al. Hypercholesterolemia Association with Aortic Stenosis of Various Etiologies. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2009; 24(2): 146-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2009.00814.x

5. Hellenthal FAMVI, Pulinx B, Welten RJThJ, et al. Circulating Biomarkers and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Size. Journal of Surgical Research. 2012; 176(2): 672-678. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.040

6. Michelena HI, Della Corte A, Evangelista A, et al. International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2021; 60(3): 448-476. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab038

7. Wang Y, Wu B, Dong L, et al. Circulating matrix metalloproteinase patterns in association with aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis. Heart and Vessels. 2014; 31(2): 189-197. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0593-5

8. Schnell S, Smith DA, Barker AJ, et al. Altered aortic shape in bicuspid aortic valve relatives influences blood flow patterns. European Heart Journal–Cardiovascular Imaging. 2016; 17(11): 1239-1247. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew149

9. D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care. Circulation. 2008; 117(6): 743-753. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579

10. Walldius G, Jungner I, Holme I, et al. High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet. 2001; 358(9298): 2026-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07098-2

11. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2015; 28(1): 1-39.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003