Comparison of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy and LEEP in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2

  • Xiaofang Liu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing 100142, China
  • Qiming Qu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing 100142, China
  • Jiahui Lv Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing 100142, China
  • Hongfang Wang Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing 100142, China
  • Jingxuan Li * Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing 100142, China
  • Jinghui Jia Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, Beijing 100142, China
Article ID: 4569
Keywords: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2; photodynamic; HPV; cervical LEEP

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy (ALA-PDT) on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2) and the clearance effect of high risk human papiloma virus (HRHPV). papillomavirus (high risk human papiloma virus, HRHPV) clearance effect. Methods: Patients treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions, HSIL/CIN2 from February 2018 to February 2023 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Air Force Specialty Medical Center were collected. Patients with CIN2 who met the eligibility criteria for enrollment were included and divided into a treatment group (ALA-PDT) and a control group (LEEP) in a 1:1 ratio, using a non-inferiority, single-center, open-blind, controlled clinical study method. Results: There were 96 people in the treatment group, of whom 91 were treated effectively. In the control group, 107 people were treated, of whom 104 were effective. The effective rate of the control group was 97.20%, and the effective rate of the treatment group was 95.83%, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The risk ratio was 0.986 (95%–102%). Difference between the two groups: −1.36% (−5.77%, 3.05%), based on the lower limit of the confidence interval being greater than Δ, i.e., −10%. Therefore, the treatment group was non-inferior to the control group. Conclusion: ALA-PDT is an effective and safe noninvasive treatment for patients with cervical HSIL/CIN2. It not only effectively removes diseased tissue and HR-HPV, but also preserves the intact tissue structure of the cervix, and can be used as a therapeutic approach for sick women of reproductive age and patients who wish to observe treatment, which may reduce nonessential surgery.

Published
2025-08-18

References

1. Wu SX, Ren XY, Pan YL, et al. Effects of ALA-PDT on HPV16-immortalized cervical epithelial cell. Neoplasma. 2017; 64(2): 175-181.

2. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2020; 24(2): 102-131. doi: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000525

3. Tainio K, Athanasiou A, Tikkinen KAO, et al. Clinical course of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 under active surveillance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018; k499. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k499

4. Zhang W, Zhang A, Sun W, et al. Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papilloma virus infection. Medicine. 2018; 97(21): e10864. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000010864

5. Liu Y, Wu R, Li R, et al. Progress of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the vagina. Chinese Clinical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; 25(06): 551-553.

6. Zhu Y, Guan D, Shi W, et al. Clinical application of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of cervical lesions. Systemic medicine. 2024; 9(02): 186-188.

7. Maldonado AE, Osorio PM, Moreno VA, et al. Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy in Elimination of HPV-16 and HPV-18 Associated with CIN I in Mexican Women. Photochem Photobiol. 2017; 93(5): 1269–1275.

8. Chen JF. Clinical efficacy analysis of 5-ALA photodynamic therapy and CO2 laser in the treatment of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Southern Medical University; 2024.

9. Li M, Wei L, Sui L, et al. Guidelines for cervical cancer screening in China. Electronic Journal of Comprehensive Cancer Therapy. 2023; 9(03): 41-48.

10. Skorstengaard M, Lynge E, Suhr J, et al. Conservative management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in Denmark: a cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2020; 127(6): 729-736. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16081

11. Khan MJ, Werner CL, Darragh TM, et al. ASCCP Colposcopy Standards: Role of Colposcopy, Benefits, Potential Harms, and Terminology for Colposcopic Practice. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2017; 21(4): 223-229. doi: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000338

12. Wu A, Li Q, Ling J, et al. Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy in women of reproductive age with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL/CIN2). Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2021; 36: 102517. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102517

13. Bogani G, Raspagliesi F, Sopracordevole F, et al. Assessing the Long-Term Role of Vaccination against HPV after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP): A Propensity-Score Matched Comparison. Vaccines. 2020; 8(4): 717. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040717

14. Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(12): 1665-1679.

15. Loopik DL, Bentley HA, Eijgenraam MN, et al. The Natural History of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grades 1, 2, and 3: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2021; 25(3): 221-231. doi: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000604

16. Zhang WY, Zhang YF, Lu Y, et al. 5-Clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with aminoketoglutaric acid inⅡ grade. Chinese Journal of Practical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2024; 38(04): 382-385.

17. Wang X, Cui Q, Han L, et al. Correlation between high-risk human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Chinese Journal of Hospital Infection. 2024; 34(8): 1222-1226.

18. Arbyn M, Ronco G, Anttila A, et al. Evidence Regarding Human Papillomavirus Testing in Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer. Vaccine. 2012; 30: F88-F99. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.095

19. Yang L, Liu D, Wang F. Value of high-risk human papillomavirus typing and liquid-based thin-layer cytology in screening for cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer. Journal of Clinical and Pathologic Medicine. 2023; 43(06): 1150-1156.

20. Perkins RB, Wentzensen N, Guido RS, et al. Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA. 2023; 330(6): 547. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.13174

21. Yuan Y, Cai X, Shen F, et al. HPV post-infection microenvironment and cervical cancer. Cancer Letters. 2021; 497: 243-254. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.10.034

22. Gaynanova G, Vasileva L, Kashapov R, et al. Self-Assembling Drug Formulations with Tunable Permeability and Biodegradability. Molecules. 2021; 26(22): 6786. doi: 10.3390/molecules26226786

23. Li M, Liu T, Luo G, et al. Incidence, persistence and clearance of cervical human papillomavirus among women in Guangdong, China 2007–2018: A retrospective cohort study. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2021; 14(1): 42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.11.011